Mechanical characteristics and FEA-based non-uniform infill density approaches for Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM)-printed components: A literature review

Mhd. Fahri Meihanda Putra; Syahril Syahril; Delima Yanti Sari

doi:10.58712/jerel.v5i2.220

Authors

Mhd. Fahri Meihanda Putra Departement Of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty Of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
Syahril Syahril Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
Delima Yanti Sari Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58712/jerel.v5i2.220

Keywords:

additive manufacturing, fused deposition modelling, finite element analysis, non-uniform infill density, topology optimization, anisotropy

Abstract

Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) is one of the most widely used additive manufacturing (AM) technologies for producing functional polymer components. However, commercially available slicing software generally applies a uniform infill density throughout the entire component without considering the actual stress distribution, resulting in excessive material usage in low-stress regions and unnecessary increases in component weight. This literature review synthesizes current knowledge on the mechanical characteristics of FDM-printed components and evaluates Finite Element Analysis (FEA)-based non-uniform infill density approaches as a promising strategy for structural optimization. The reviewed literature covers the effects of anisotropic behaviour, internal voids, infill density, infill pattern, and the integration of FEA with topology optimization techniques for FDM components. The findings indicate that the layer-by-layer deposition process produces pronounced mechanical anisotropy and introduces internal voids that influence structural performance. The relationship between infill density and mechanical strength is positive but nonlinear, whereas different infill patterns at the same density can produce variations of up to 82% in flexural strength. Although FEA provides reliable estimates of stress distribution, prediction errors of approximately 8.67–12% remain because conventional simulations assume homogeneous and isotropic materials that do not accurately represent the actual characteristics of FDM-printed components. Furthermore, FEA-based multi-zone non-uniform infill density strategies have been reported to increase peak load by up to 49% and bending stiffness by up to 46% compared with conventional uniform-density configurations. Overall, this review demonstrates that FEA-based non-uniform infill density is a promising design optimization strategy for functional FDM-printed components by improving structural performance while reducing unnecessary material usage. Future research should focus on density transition design and experimental validation to improve the reliability and practical implementation of this approach.

References

Abeykoon, C., Sri-Amphorn, P., & Fernando, A. (2020). Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture, 3(3), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003

Acierno, D., & Patti, A. (2023). Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) of Thermoplastic-Based Filaments: Process and Rheological Properties—An Overview. Materials, 16(24), 7664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16247664

Ahn, S., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., & Wright, P. K. (2002). Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 8(4), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540210441166

Aliheidari, N., Christ, J., Tripuraneni, R., Nadimpalli, S., & Ameli, A. (2018). Interlayer adhesion and fracture resistance of polymers printed through melt extrusion additive manufacturing process. Materials & Design, 156, 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.001

Bachhav, C. Y., Sonawwanay, P. D., Naik, M., & Thakur, D. G. (2023). Experimental and FEA analysis of flexural properties of 3D printed parts. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.262

Bandinelli, F., Scapin, M., & Peroni, L. (2024). Effects of anisotropy and infill pattern on compression properties of 3D printed CFRP: mechanical analysis and elasto-plastic finite element modelling. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 30(11), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-11-2023-0385

Bean, P., Lopez-Anido, R. A., & Vel, S. (2022). Numerical Modeling and Experimental Investigation of Effective Elastic Properties of the 3D Printed Gyroid Infill. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12042180

Birosz, M. T., & Andó, M. (2023). Simplified local infill size optimization for FDM printed PLA parts. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33181-4

Birosz, M. T., Ledenyák, D., & Andó, M. (2022). Effect of FDM infill patterns on mechanical properties. Polymer Testing, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107654

Bol, R. J. M., & Šavija, B. (2023). Micromechanical Models for FDM 3D-Printed Polymers: A Review. In Polymers, Vol. 15, Number 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15234497

Boztepe, M. H., & Haskul, M. (2026). Mechanical Characterization of PLA+ Specimens with Different Geometries Using Experimental and Numerical Methods. Polymers, 18(2), 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18020243

Budynas, R. G., & Keith Nisbett, J. (2015). Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design 10th Edition.

Buss, C., Reci, F., Hribernig, T., & Steininger, S. (2026). Experimental Investigation into the Influence of Infill Density, Print Pattern, and Built-Up Direction on the Flexural Strength of FFF-Manufactured PLA Components. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 10(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10010021

Dai, G., Liang, Y., Sun, Z., Zhang, M., Guo, Y., Liu, J., & Li, X. (2025). Influence of process parameters on microscopic morphology and mechanical properties of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced polyamide6 composites. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 39, 9070–9082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.11.243

Dizon, J. R. C., Espera, A. H., Chen, Q., & Advincula, R. C. (2018). Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 20, pp. 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002

El Omari, A., Ouballouch, A., & Nassraoui, M. (2024). Impact of infill pattern and infill density on mechanical properties of FDM 3D printed parts: a review Impact du motif de remplissage et de la densité de remplissage sur les propriétés mécaniques des pièces 3D imprimées par FDM: une revue. https://openscience.fr/IMG/pdf/iste_incertfia24v8n1_7.pdf

Fekia?, J. J., Kakošová, L., Krbata, M., Kohutiar, M., Eckert, M., Studeny, Z., & Dubec, A. (2025). Influence of Infill Geometry and Density on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid Structure. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp9040134

Fico, D., Rizzo, D., Casciaro, R., & Corcione, C. E. (2022). A Review of Polymer-Based Materials for Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF): Focus on Sustainability and Recycled Materials. Polymers Vol. 14, Number 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14030465

Garg, S., Singh, A., & Murtaza, Q. (2025). Measuring the Impact of Infill Pattern and Infill Density on the Properties of 3D-Printed PLA via FDM. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 34(19), 22597–22610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-025-10837-y

Hozdi?, E., & Hozdi?, E. (2025). Mechanical Parameters and Microstructural Evolution of FDM-Printed PLA and PLA+CF Under Variable Infill Architecture and Lubricant Exposure. Polymers, 18(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18010072

Iacob, D. V., Zisopol, D. G., & Minescu, M. (2025). Study on the Optimization of FDM Parameters for the Manufacture of Three-Point Bending Specimens from PETG and Recycled PETG in the Context of the Transition to the Circular Economy. Polymers, 17(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17121645

Kazmer, D. (2017). Three-Dimensional Printing of Plastics. Applied Plastics Engineering Handbook (pp. 617–634). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-39040-8.00029-8

Kuznetsov, V. E., Solonin, A. N., Urzhumtsev, O. D., Schilling, R., & Tavitov, A. G. (2018). Strength of PLA components fabricated with fused deposition technology using a desktop 3D printer as a function of geometrical parameters of the process. Polymers, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10030313

Liu, F., Shao, Y., & Chen, M. (2026). Generative design strategies for additive manufacturing of lattice structures: A review. Materials and Design, Vol. 262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2026.115431

Liu, J., Su, Z., Wang, C., & Xu, Z. (2022). Effect of an Adaptive-Density Filling Structure on the Mechanical Properties of FDM Parts with a Variable Cross-Section. Materials, 15(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248746

Lubombo, C., & Huneault, M. A. (2018). Effect of infill patterns on the mechanical performance of lightweight 3D-printed cellular PLA parts. Materials Today Communications, 17, 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2018.09.017

McLouth, T. D., Severino, J. V., Adams, P. M., Patel, D. N., & Zaldivar, R. J. (2017). The impact of print orientation and raster pattern on fracture toughness in additively manufactured ABS. Additive Manufacturing, 18, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.09.003

Monzón, M., Ortega, Z., Hernández, A., Paz, R., & Ortega, F. (2017). Anisotropy of photopolymer parts made by digital light processing. Materials, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10010064

Öteyaka, M. Ö., Aybar, K., & Öteyaka, H. C. (2021). Effect of Infill Ratio on the Tensile and Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polylactic Acid Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 30(7), 5203–5215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05694-4

Pais, A., Alves, J. L., & Belinha, J. (2022). Functional Gradients of the Gyroid Infill for Structural Optimization. 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022008072

Paul, S. (2021). Finite element analysis in fused deposition modeling research: A literature review. Measurement, 178, 109320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109320

Raja, P., Babu, K., Kaynak, E., & Das, O. (2025). Impact of Design Variations and Infill Density in 3D-Printed PLA Components. Polymers, 17(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17243336

Ramírez-Prieto, J. S., Martínez-Yáñez, J. S., & González-Hernández, A. G. (2025). Effect of raster angle on the tensile and flexural strength of 3D printed PLA+ parts. AIMS Materials Science, 12(2), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2025019

Sandanamsamy, L., Harun, W. S. W., Ishak, I., Romlay, F. R. M., Kadirgama, K., Ramasamy, D., Idris, S. R. A., & Tsumori, F. (2023). A comprehensive review on fused deposition modelling of polylactic acid. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 8(5), 775–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00356-w

Seifollahi, M., & Kabir, M. Z. (2025). Fatigue Life Assessment of Notched PLA Manufactured Using FDM 3D-Printing Technique. Polymers, 18(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18010001

Sriya Ambati, S., & Ambatipudi, R. (2022). Effect of infill density and infill pattern on the mechanical properties of 3D printed PLA parts. Materials Today: Proceedings, 64, 804–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.312

Steck, P., Schuler, D., Witzgall, C., & Wartzack, S. (2024). A New Slicer-Based Method to Generate Infill Inspired by Sandwich-Patterns for Reduced Material Consumption. Materials, 17(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225596

Sukumaar, V. N., Rangappa, S. M., Liu, Y., & Siengchin, S. (2026). A comprehensive review on the influence of fused deposition modelling process parameters upon thermoplastic composite materials. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research, Vol. 9, Number 2, pp. 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2025.11.006

Tanveer, M. Q., Haleem, A., & Suhaib, M. (2019). Effect of variable infill density on mechanical behaviour of 3-D printed PLA specimen: an experimental investigation. SN Applied Sciences, 1(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1744-1

Tofail, S. A. M., Koumoulos, E. P., Bandyopadhyay, A., Bose, S., O’Donoghue, L., & Charitidis, C. (2018). Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Materials Today, 21(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001

Toth, A. D., & Padayachee, J. (2023). Using topology optimisation to influence the infill placement of fused deposition modelled parts. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 34(4), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.7166/34-4-2900

Tronvoll, S. A., Welo, T., & Elverum, C. W. (2018). The effects of voids on structural properties of fused deposition modelled parts: a probabilistic approach. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 97(9–12), 3607–3618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2148-x

Vosynek, P., Navrat, T., Krejbychova, A., & Palousek, D. (2018). Influence of Process Parameters of Printing on Mechanical Properties of Plastic Parts Produced by FDM 3D Printing Technology. MATEC Web of Conferences, 237, 02014. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823702014

Wicaksono, M. B., & Felix Krisna Aji Nugraha. (2022). Optimization of 3D Printing Parameters Using the Taguchi Method to Improve Dimensional Precision. Jurnal Teknologi, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.35134/jitekin.v12i2.72

Yang, B. (2025). The influence of infill density on the mechanical properties of PLA samples in FDM 3D printing. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 3019(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3019/1/012046

Zhou, L., Miller, J., Vezza, J., Mayster, M., Raffay, M., Justice, Q., Al Tamimi, Z., Hansotte, G., Sunkara, L. D., & Bernat, J. (2024). Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review. In Sensors (Vol. 24, Number 9).https://doi.org/10.3390/s24092668

Zohdi, N., & Yang, R. (Chunhui). (2021). Material Anisotropy in Additively Manufactured Polymers and Polymer Composites: A Review. Polymers, 13(19), 3368. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193368