System dynamics for integrated domestic wastewater management: A review of stock–flow models, policy scenarios, and river water quality

Widia Putri; Denny Helard; Shinta Indah

doi:10.58712/jerel.v5i2.221

Authors

Widia Putri Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia
Denny Helard Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia
Shinta Indah Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Andalas, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58712/jerel.v5i2.221

Keywords:

system dynamics, domestic wastewater, stock–flow model, policy scenarios, river water quality, urban sanitation

Abstract

Domestic wastewater management is a long-term systems problem shaped by population growth, water use, sanitation coverage, treatment capacity, infrastructure deterioration, institutional performance, finance, pollutant generation, and receiving-water conditions. This review synthesizes the use of System Dynamics (SD) for integrated domestic wastewater planning, with emphasis on causal-loop structures, stock–flow models, policy scenarios, pollutant-load estimation, and river-water-quality responses. A structured narrative search covering 2010 to June 2026 was used to identify peer-reviewed studies that applied explicit SD concepts to wastewater, sanitation, water pollution, or coupled water-quality management. The literature shows that most models represent population, wastewater generation, treatment capacity, and pollution control, but fewer integrate on-site sanitation, faecal-sludge pathways, microbiological pollutants, river hydrology, climate stress, finance, and institutional behavior in one model. Scenario analysis is widely used, particularly business-as-usual, capacity expansion, service-coverage improvement, treatment-efficiency enhancement, and combined-policy scenarios. The evidence indicates that isolated infrastructure expansion often underperforms when household connections, operation and maintenance, financing, or treatment efficiency remain constrained. More robust models combine service coverage and capacity dynamics with pollutant mass balance, receiving-water dilution, validation tests, and sensitivity or uncertainty analysis. Coastal and data-limited cities require additional representation of shallow groundwater, infiltration and inflow, flooding, tidal backwater, sea-level rise, and the dominance of on-site sanitation. The review proposes an integrated framework linking socio-demographic, service, infrastructure, treatment, pollutant, river-quality, financial, institutional, and climate subsystems. Future development should priorities spatial SD, participatory modelling, global sensitivity analysis, adaptive policy pathways, real-time monitoring, and hybridization with GIS, hydrological models, optimization, and machine learning.

References

Barlas, Y. (1989). Multiple tests for validation of system dynamics type of simulation models. European Journal of Operational Research, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(89)90059-3

Barlas, Y. (1996). Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1727(199623)12:3<183::aid-sdr103>3.0.co;2-4

Cahoon, L. B., & Hanke, M. H. (2019). Inflow and infiltration in coastal wastewater collection systems: effects of rainfall, temperature, and sea level. Water Environment Research, 91(4), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1036

Chen, W. B., Liu, W. C., & Hsu, M. H. (2011). Water quality modeling in a tidal estuarine system using a three-dimensional model. Environmental Engineering Science, 28(6). https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2010.0310

Chidiac, S., El Najjar, P., Ouaini, N., El Rayess, Y., & El Azzi, D. (2023). A comprehensive review of water quality indices (WQIs): history, models, attempts and perspectives. In Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology (Vol. 22, Number 2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09650-7

De Brauwere, A., Ouattara, N. K., & Servais, P. (2014). Modeling fecal indicator bacteria concentrations in natural surface waters: A review. In Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology (Vol. 44, Number 21). https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2013.829978

Demirel, D. F., Gönül-Sezer, E. D., & Pehlivan, S. A. (2022). Analyzing the wastewater treatment facility location/network design problem via system dynamics: Antalya, Turkey case. Journal of Environmental Management, 320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115814

Flood, J. F., & Cahoon, L. B. (2011). Risks to coastal wastewater collection systems from sea-level rise and climate change. Journal of Coastal Research, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00129.1

Fung, A., & Babcock, R. (2020). A flow-calibrated method to project groundwater infiltration into coastal sewers affected by sea level rise. Water (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071934

Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E., & ter Maat, J. (2013). Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Global Environmental Change, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006

Harahap, J., Gunawan, T., Suprayogi, S., & Widyastuti, M. (2021). A review: Domestic wastewater management system in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 739(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/739/1/012031

Hummel, M. A., Berry, M. S., & Stacey, M. T. (2018). Sea Level Rise Impacts on Wastewater Treatment Systems Along the U.S. Coasts. Earth’s Future, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000805

Jeong, H., & Adamowski, J. (2016). A system dynamics based socio-hydrological model for agricultural wastewater reuse at the watershed scale. Agricultural Water Management, 171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.03.019

Jones, E. R., Van Vliet, M. T. H., Qadir, M., & Bierkens, M. F. P. (2021). Country-level and gridded estimates of wastewater production, collection, treatment and reuse. Earth System Science Data, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-237-2021

Kachroud, M., Trolard, F., Kefi, M., Jebari, S., & Bourrié, G. (2019). Water quality indices: Challenges and application limits in the literature. Water (Switzerland), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020361

Kayal, B., Massoud, M., & Nicolescu, C.-M. (2026). Integrated system dynamics approach to wastewater management in Jordan: Balancing environmental compliance and economic sustainability. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 30, 200341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2026.200341

Kelly, R. A., Jakeman, A. J., Barreteau, O., Borsuk, M. E., ElSawah, S., Hamilton, S. H., Henriksen, H. J., Kuikka, S., Maier, H. R., Rizzoli, A. E., van Delden, H., & Voinov, A. A. (2013). Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005

Kwakkel, J. H., Haasnoot, M., & Walker, W. E. (2016). Comparing Robust Decision-Making and Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways for model-based decision support under deep uncertainty. Environmental Modelling and Software, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.017

Lemaire, G. G., Carnohan, S. A., Grand, S., Mazel, V., Bjerg, P. L., & McKnight, U. S. (2021). Data?driven system dynamics model for simulating water quantity and quality in peri?urban streams. Water (Switzerland), 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/w13213002

Li, Y., Cheng, S., Li, Z., Song, H., Guo, M., Li, Z., Mang, H. P., Xu, Y., Chen, C., Basandorj, D., Zhang, L., & Li, T. (2021). Using system dynamics to assess the complexity of rural toilet retrofitting: Case study in eastern China. Journal of Environmental Management, 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111655

Liu, H., Benoit, G., Liu, T., Liu, Y., & Guo, H. (2015). An integrated system dynamics model developed for managing lake water quality at the watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Management, 155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.046

Mbae, M., Hansen, P., Way, C., Mills, F., Willetts, J., Foster, T., & Evans, B. (2024). Onsite sanitation systems and contamination of groundwater: A systematic review of the evidence for risk using the source-pathway-receptor model. PLOS Water, 3(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000167

Medland, L. S., Scott, R. E., & Cotton, A. P. (2016). Achieving sustainable sanitation chains through better informed and more systematic improvements: Lessons from multi-city research in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ew00255a

Oliva, R. (2003). Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models. European Journal of Operational Research, 151(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00622-7

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pianosi, F., Beven, K., Freer, J., Hall, J. W., Rougier, J., Stephenson, D. B., & Wagener, T. (2016). Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: A systematic review with practical workflow. In Environmental Modelling and Software (Vol. 79). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.008

Putri, E. E., Galib, M., & Mubarak, M. (2021). Analysis of Inundation area as an Impact of Sea Level Rise in Kota Pariaman District, West Sumatera Province. Journal of Coastal and Ocean Sciences, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.31258/jocos.2.3.193-200

Putri, G. L., Ilmi, A. M., Handayani, R., Iskandar, D., Priadi, C. R., Willetts, J., & Foster, T. (2025). On-site sanitation systems and fecal contamination in shallow groundwater in urban Indonesia: assessing influence of distance and rainfall variables. Water Research, 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124431

Qudrat-Ullah, H., & Seong, B. S. (2010). How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: The case of an energy policy model. Energy Policy, 38(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.009

Rehan, R., Knight, M. A., Haas, C. T., & Unger, A. J. A. (2011). Application of system dynamics for developing financially self-sustaining management policies for water and wastewater systems. Water Research, 45(16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.06.001

Rehan, R., Knight, M. A., Unger, A. J. A., & Haas, C. T. (2014). Financially sustainable management strategies for urban wastewater collection infrastructure - development of a system dynamics model. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.12.003

Rehan, R., Unger, A. J. A., Knight, M. A., & Haas, C. T. (2014). Financially sustainable management strategies for urban wastewater collection infrastructure - Implementation of a system dynamics model. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.12.004

Sarrazin, F., Pianosi, F., & Wagener, T. (2016). Global Sensitivity Analysis of environmental models: Convergence and validation. Environmental Modelling and Software, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.005

Stave, K. A. (2002). Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions. System Dynamics Review, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.237

Sterman, J. D. (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 10(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100214

Sterman, J. D., & Series, W. P. (2003). System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. European Journal of Computer Science, 21(3).

Sutadian, A. D., Muttil, N., Yilmaz, A. G., & Perera, B. J. C. (2016). Development of river water quality indices—a review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-5050-0

The United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) and the World Health Organization (WHO). (2024). Progress on the proportion of domestic and industrial wastewater flows safely treated – Mid-term status of SDG Indicator 6.3.1 and acceleration needs, with a special focus on climate change, wastewater reuse and health. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240099081

Tian, Y., Li, C., Yi, Y., Wang, X., & Shu, A. (2020). Dynamic model of a sustainable water resources utilization system with coupled water quality and quantity in Tianjin city. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104254

Uddin, M. G., Nash, S., & Olbert, A. I. (2021). A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality. In Ecological Indicators (Vol. 122). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107218

Wang, L., Wang, R., & Yan, H. (2021). System-dynamics modeling for exploring the impact of industrial-structure adjustment on the water quality of the river network in the Yangtze Delta Area. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147696

Wu, Y., Chen, D., Li, F., Feng, M., Wang, P., Hao, L., & Deng, C. (2025). Simulation and Control of Water Pollution Load in the Xiaoxingkai Lake Basin Based on a System Dynamics Model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157167

Zhang, X., Jiang, J., Hu, X., Wei, K., Wang, W., Luo, M., Zhang, G., & Xia, X. (2025). Long-term decision making of water availability and wastewater treatment necessity in Chinese rural areas: an analytical framework coupling system dynamics and water carrying capacity. Urban Water Journal, 22(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2025.2519107

Zhang, Y., Zhao, T., Zhou, A., Zhang, Z., & Liu, W. (2016). Scenario based municipal wastewater estimation: Development and application of a dynamic simulation model. Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1746310