Analysis of student responses toward activities using e-learning in higher education

Faiza Rini; Liani Pratiwi; Thomson Mary; Ang Ling Weay

doi:10.58712/jerel.v2i1.143

Authors

Faiza Rini Department of Informatic Education, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, INDONESIA
Liani Pratiwi Department of Informatic Education, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, INDONESIA
Thomson Mary Department of Informatic Education, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, INDONESIA
Ang Ling Weay Department of Management of Information System, Help University, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58712/jerel.v2i1.143

Keywords:

E-learning, Higher education, computer network, PGRI

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate how students respond to learning activities using e-learning. Researchers analyzed students' responses based on four aspects of activity, including attendance discipline, assignment collection accuracy, enthusiastic use of e-learning teaching materials, and participation in group discussions. The research method used in this study is a quantitative descriptive method and usability testing method. The data analysis technique used is descriptive percentage. The sample for this study consisted of 100 students from the informatics education study program, including the batches of 2019, 2020, and 2021. The results showed that the average response rate of students towards e-learning activities was 67.19% for the year 2019, 81.32% for the year 2020, and 78.59% for the year 2021. Based on the findings, it can be concluded that students from all three batches responded positively to the e-learning activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almaiah, M. A., & Abdul Jalil, M. (2014). Investigating Students’ Perceptions on Mobile Learning Services. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 8(4), 31. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v8i4.3965

Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(5), 975–979. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907229

Christensen, L. B. (2001). Experimental Methodology. In Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy (8th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

Coman, C., ?îru, L. G., Mese?an-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective. Sustainability, 12(24), 10367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410367

El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-021-00289-4/TABLES/4

Freeman, R. J. (1960). Quantitative Methods in R&D Management. California Management Review, 2(4), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165403

Jaya Saragih, M., Mas Rizky Yohannes Cristanto, R., Effendi, Y., & Zamzami, E. M. (2020). Application of Blended Learning Supporting Digital Education 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1566(1), 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1566/1/012044

Maslov, I., Nikou, S., & Hansen, P. (2021). Exploring user experience of learning management system. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(4), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-03-2021-0046

Matsuyama, Y., Nakaya, M., Okazaki, H., Lebowitz, A. J., Leppink, J., & van der Vleuten, C. (2019). Does changing from a teacher-centered to a learner-centered context promote self-regulated learning: A qualitative study in a Japanese undergraduate setting. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12909-019-1550-X/FIGURES/1

Mukarromah, U., & Wijayanti, W. (2021). Implementation of the online learning at vocational high school during Covid-19: Between obligations and barriers. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v11i1.37110

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747

Novializa, R., Rini, F., & Irsyadunas. (2022). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Dengan Metode EUCS Pada Mahasiswa. Teknik Elektro Dan Vokasional, 8(2), 213–218.

Nurhadi, N., & Harahap, M. I. (2021). Teacher’s Responsibility in Islamic Education (Relevance of Hamka and Hasan Langgulung Thought). PALAPA, 9(1), 137–181. https://doi.org/10.36088/palapa.v9i1.1065

Rawashdeh, A. Z. al, Mohammed, E. Y., Arab, A. R. al, Alara, M., & Al-Rawashdeh, B. (2021). Advantages and Disadvantages of Using e-Learning in University Education: Analyzing Students’ Perspectives. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 19(3), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.19.3.2168

Rini, F., Tanto, & Purnama, F. (2021). Efektifitas Pengembangan E-Learning dengan LMS Moodle dan Laboratorium Virtual Pada Pendidikan Tinggi. ELTI, 3(1), 20–27.

Ross, S. (2010). A First Course in Probability (8th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Schreurs, J., & Dumbraveanu, R. (2014). A Shift from Teacher Centered to Learner Centered Approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 4(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i3.3395

Shi, F. (2015). Study on a Stratified Sampling Investigation Method for Resident Travel and the Sampling Rate. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2015, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/496179