Comparison of NaOH and Na2CO3 as absorbents for CO2 absorption in carbon capture and storage technology

Authors

  • Fadhilah Ikhsan Dinul Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, INDONESIA
  • Hendri Nurdin Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, INDONESIA
  • Dieter Rahmadiawan Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, INDONESIA
  • Nasruddin Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, INDONESIA
  • Imtiaz Ali Laghari Department of Electrical Engineering, Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology, PAKISTAN
  • Tarig Elshaarani Sudan Atomic Energy Commission, Institute of Chemistry & Nuclear Physics, SUDAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58712/jerel.v2i1.23

Keywords:

CO2, NaOH, NaCO3, Absorption, Absorbent

Abstract

CO2 gas is a greenhouse gas that causes global warming. Greenhouse gases are gases in the atmosphere that can absorb and reflect infrared radiation from the Earth's surface. Currently, the energy demand still depends on fossil fuels. On the other hand, CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels continue to increase and contribute as greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. CO2 capture is an effort to reduce the burden of CO2 emissions into the atmosphere and is part of the Carbon, Capture, and Storage (CCS) protocol. The CO2 absorption process applied in the chemical industry is one of the CO2 absorptions using NaOH and Na2CO3 solutions as absorbents. This research aims to determine the effect of absorbent flow rate on the percentage of absorbed CO2. The method used in this research is the SLR (Systematic Literature Review) method to identify all available research. The absorbent flow rate variations used are 1 liter/minute, 1.5 liters/minute, 2 liters/minute, 2.5 liters/minute, and 3 liters/minute. The absorption process using NaOH absorbent is capable of absorbing CO2 gas with a maximum absorption of 95.52% and a minimum of 79.14%. Meanwhile, in the Na2CO3 absorbent, it is capable of absorbing CO2 gas with a maximum amount absorbed of 72.45% and a minimum of 35.47%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acién Fernández, F. G., González-López, C. V., Fernández Sevilla, J. M., & Molina Grima, E. (2012). Conversion of CO2 into biomass by microalgae: how realistic a contribution may it be to significant CO2 removal? Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 96(3), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4362-z

Altway, A., Susianto, S., Suprapto, S., Nurkhamidah, S., Nisa, N. I. F., Hardiyanto, F., Mulya, H. R., & Altway, S. (2015a). Modeling and Simulation of CO2 Absorption into Promoted Aqueous Potassium Carbonate Solution in Industrial Scale Packed Column. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.9767/bcrec.10.2.7063.111-124

Altway, A., Susianto, S., Suprapto, S., Nurkhamidah, S., Nisa, N. I. F., Hardiyanto, F., Mulya, H. R., & Altway, S. (2015b). Modeling and Simulation of CO2 Absorption into Promoted Aqueous Potassium Carbonate Solution in Industrial Scale Packed Column. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, 10(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.9767/BCREC.10.2.7063.111-124

Astarita, G., Savage, D. W., & Bisio, A. L. (1983). Gas treating with chemical solvents.

Ghosh, U. K., Kentish, S. E., & Stevens, G. W. (2009). Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous potassium carbonate promoted by boric acid. Energy Procedia, 1(1), 1075–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.142

Gibbins, J., & Chalmers, H. (2008). Carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4317–4322. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2008.09.058

Hikita, H., Asai, S., & Takatsuka, T. (1976). Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous sodium hydroxide and sodium carbonate-bicarbonate solutions. The Chemical Engineering Journal, 11(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9467(76)80035-4

Javed, K., Mahmud, T., & Purba, E. (2010). The CO2 capture performance of a high-intensity vortex spray scrubber. Chemical Engineering Journal, 162, 448–456.

Kanniche, M., & Bouallou, C. (2007). CO2 capture study in advanced integrated gasification combined cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering, 27(16), 2693–2702. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2007.04.007

Karali, D., Peloriadi, K., Margaritis, N., & Grammelis, P. (2022). CO2 Absorption Using Potassium Carbonate as Solvent. ASEC 2022, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2022-13824

Ningsih, E., Sato, A., Nafiuddin, A., Putranto, W. S., Kimia, T., Adhi, T., Surabaya, T., Arief, J., & Hakim, R. (2017). Absorpsi Gas CO 2 Berpromotor MSG Dalam Larutan K2CO3. Seminar Nasional Inovasi Dan Aplikasi Teknologi Di Industri, 3(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.36040/SENIATI.V3I2.1941

Nisa, N. I. F., Altway, A., & S, S. (2019). Simulasi Unit Stripping CO2 Dalam Packed Column Skala Industri Dengan Kondisi Non-Isothermal. Jurnal Rekayasa Kimia & Lingkungan, 14(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.23955/rkl.v14i1.13547

Purba, E., Agustina, D., Pertama, F. P., & Senja, F. (2018). Absorption of CO2 from modified flue gases of power generation Tarahan chemically using NaOH and Na2CO3 and biologically using microalgae. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 141, 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/141/1/012023

Robiah, R., Renaldi, U., & Melani, A. (2021). Kajian pengaruh laju alir NaOH dan waktu kontak terhadap absorpsi gas CO2 menggunakan alat absorber tipe sieve tray. Jurnal Distilasi, 6(2), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.32502/JD.V6I2.4136

Sembiring, S., Sembiring, S., Panjaitan, R. L., Susianto, S., & Altway, A. (2020). Pemanfaatan Gas Alam sebagai LPG (Liquified Petroleum Gas). Jurnal Teknik ITS, 8(2), F206–F211. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v8i2.47079

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2019.07.039

Sutanto, R. (2021). Performance of 100 CC Combustion Engine With Refined Biogas Fuel With Coconut Ash as Adsorbent. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM), 3, 608. https://doi.org/10.35629/5252-0304608613

Trisnaliani, L., Eka Pranata, D., Fatria, Tahdid, Ridwan, K., Nurizzman Alfarizi, M., & Pandapotan Lumbantoruan, M. (2020). The Effect of flowrate and NaOH Concentration to CO2 Reduction in Biogas Products Using Absorber. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1500(1), 012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1500/1/012054

Yi, F., Zou, H. K., Chu, G. W., Shao, L., & Chen, J. F. (2009). Modeling and experimental studies on absorption of CO2 by Benfield solution in rotating packed bed. Chemical Engineering Journal, 145(3), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2008.08.004

Yincheng, G., Zhenqi, N., & Wenyi, L. (2011). Comparison of removal efficiencies of carbon dioxide between aqueous ammonia and NaOH solution in a fine spray column. Energy Procedia, 4, 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.082

Yu, C. H., Huang, C. H., & Tan, C. S. (2012). A Review of CO2 Capture by Absorption and Adsorption. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 12(5), 745–769. https://doi.org/10.4209/AAQR.2012.05.0132

Žalys, B., Venslauskas, K., Navickas, K., Buivydas, E., & Rubežius, M. (2023). The Influence of CO2 Injection into Manure as a Pretreatment Method for Increased Biogas Production. Sustainability, 15(4), 3670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043670

Zhao, B., Su, Y., Tao, W., Li, L., & Peng, Y. (2012). Post-combustion CO2 capture by aqueous ammonia: A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 9, 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJGGC.2012.05.006

Downloads

Published

2023-04-27

How to Cite

Dinul, F. I., Nurdin, H., Rahmadiawan, D., Nasruddin, Laghari, I. A., & Elshaarani, T. (2023). Comparison of NaOH and Na2CO3 as absorbents for CO2 absorption in carbon capture and storage technology. Journal of Engineering Researcher and Lecturer, 2(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.58712/jerel.v2i1.23

Issue

Section

Engineering