Analysis of the difference in biogas volume between continuous and semi-continuous systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58712/jerel.v1i1.5Keywords:
Biogas, volume, continue system, semi-continue systemAbstract
The increasing demand for energy, driven by population growth and reduced sources of oil reserves, puts pressure on every country to produce and use renewable energy as a substitute. One of the alternative energy sources is biogas, which is produced using EM4 bacteria that balance microorganisms. In this study, microorganism inoculants consisting of 90% Lactobacillus, produced from cow dung, were accommodated in an HDPE plastic container with a volume of 1 m3. Data collection was carried out from the first to the fourteenth day, with pressure data retrieved using a pressure gauge, temperature data retrieved using a thermometer gun, and the volume of biogas measured using an Arduino-based flow meter. The study found that a 1x1 meter HDPE polymer container can accommodate a maximum biogas volume of 208.12 liters. In the non-continuous system, the volume of biogas produced is not stable. The total volume of biogas produced before going through the filter for 14 days was 1075.12 liters with an average volume of 76.79 liters/day, while the total volume of biogas that had been through the filter for 14 days was 995.71 liters with an average volume of 71.12 liters/day.
Downloads
References
Afisna, L. P., Verdia, V. D., Syaukani, M., & Saputra, A. (2022). Adsorbent-based Biogas Quality Analysis through Purification Process. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TEKNOLOGI KEJURUAN, 5(3), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.24036/JPTK.V5I3.27623
Aili Hamzah, A. F., Hamzah, M. H., Mazlan, N. I., Che Man, H., Jamali, N. S., Siajam, S. I., & Show, P. L. (2022). Optimization of subcritical water pre-treatment for biogas enhancement on co-digestion of pineapple waste and cow dung using the response surface methodology. Waste Management, 150, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2022.06.042
Datong, Z. (1989). An analysis of domestic biogas storage installations in China. Biomass, 20(1–2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-4565(89)90021-8
Glivin, G., Mariappan, V., Premalatha, M., Hareesh Krishnan, H., & Joseph Sekhar, S. (2022). Comparative study of biogas production with cow dung and kitchen waste in Fiber-Reinforced Plastic (FRP) biodigesters. Materials Today: Proceedings, 52, 2264–2267. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.08.098
Iweka, S. C., Owuama, K. C., Chukwuneke, J. L., & Falowo, O. A. (2021). Optimization of biogas yield from anaerobic co-digestion of corn-chaff and cow dung digestate: RSM and python approach. Heliyon, 7(11), e08255. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2021.E08255
Kabeyi, M. J. B., & Olanrewaju, O. A. (2022). Technologies for biogas to electricity conversion. Energy Reports, 8, 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYR.2022.11.007
Kaushal, R., Sandhu, S., & Kumar Soni, M. (2022). Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, algae, and cow dung for biogas yield enhancement as a prospective approach for environmental sustainability. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52, 102236. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SETA.2022.102236
Kunatsa, T., & Xia, X. (2021). Co-digestion of water hyacinth, municipal solid waste and cow dung: A methane optimised biogas–liquid petroleum gas hybrid system. Applied Energy, 304, 117716. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2021.117716
Lahbab, A., Djaafri, M., Kalloum, S., Benatiallah, A., Atelge, M. R., & Atabani, A. E. (2021). Co-digestion of vegetable peel with cow dung without external inoculum for biogas production: Experimental and a new modelling test in a batch mode. Fuel, 306, 121627. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2021.121627
Purwanta, Bayu, A. I., Mellyanawaty, M., Budiman, A., & Budhijanto, W. (2022). Techno-economic analysis of reactor types and biogas utilization schemes in thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sugarcane vinasse. Renewable Energy, 201, 864–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2022.10.087
Shaibur, M. R., Husain, H., & Arpon, S. H. (2021). Utilization of cow dung residues of biogas plant for sustainable development of a rural community. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRSUST.2021.100026
Sharma, B., & Suthar, S. (2021). Enriched biogas and biofertilizer production from Eichhornia weed biomass in cow dung biochar-amended anaerobic digestion system. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 21, 101201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ETI.2020.101201
Singh, S., Hariteja, N., Sharma, S., Raju, N. J., & Prasad, T. J. R. (2021). Production of biogas from human faeces mixed with the co-substrate poultry litter & cow dung. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 23, 101551. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ETI.2021.101551
van Tran, G., Ramaraj, R., Balakrishnan, D., Nadda, A. K., & Unpaprom, Y. (2022). Simultaneous carbon dioxide reduction and methane generation in biogas for rural household use via anaerobic digestion of wetland grass with cow dung. Fuel, 317, 123487. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2022.123487
Werkneh, A. A. (2022). Biogas impurities: environmental and health implications, removal technologies and future perspectives. Heliyon, 8(10), e10929. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E10929
Xie, T., Herbert, C., Zitomer, D., Kimbell, L., Stafford, M., & Venkiteshwaran, K. (2023). Biogas conditioning and digestate recycling by microalgae: Acclimation of Chlorella vulgaris to H2S-containing biogas and high NH4-N digestate and effect of biogas: Digestate ratio. Chemical Engineering Journal, 453, 139788. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2022.139788
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Lathifa Putri Afisna, Bagas Nugroho Jati Rahadi, Chau Trung Tin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
